Showing posts with label Election. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Election. Show all posts

A Race Of Lazaruses



I saw this on Brittany's facebook status:

"The One who gave the command to Lazarus (to rise from the dead) gave life to him so that Lazarus could respond to the command. We are a race of Lazaruses." _j.macarthur

photo credit: Carissa Gallo

Why The Arminian View Of Election Is Incompatible With Scripture

There are generally two views on the doctrine of election. One says that God looks down the corridor of time to see who would put faith in Him. With God's foreknowledge He is able to see who would believe in Him and it is those people whom God elects to salvation. As I understand it, this is the Arminian view of election. And it does a good job at preserving the will of man as the ultimate cause of our election and consequent salvation.

The other view of election says that there are no conditions on which God elects a sinner to salvation. Election is the perogative of God and God's choosing of people for salvation is based on His Sovereign gracious will. He chooses us first and we are the ones who respond to Him. This is the Calvinist view of election. This view upholds the will of God over that of man.

I believe that the Calvinist view is the one that is in line with Scripture and that the Arminian view leaves room for boasting in what man does. According to the Arminian view, election is then based on man's choosing God first, not grace.

Now if you will follow me on this line of thought, I will hopefully explain from one angle why the Arminian view is not compatible with the Scriptural view of election.

In 2 Peter 1:1, Peter writes to those who have "obtained a like precious faith." The word "obtained" means to receive by Divine allotment. In other words, faith is given to people at the discretion of God. To put it in other terms, faith is a gift of God. This is exactly what the Apostle Paul says in Ephesians 2:8-9. Faith is a gift of God so that there is no room for boasting in what man does. If you cannot come to grips with this idea (faith as a gift) then we will not be able to go any further in this line of reasoning. You must be convinced that faith is a gift. 2 Peter says it is. Scripture supports this idea elsewhere as we'll see shortly.

A couple of questions arise at first glance...at least in my head. What is the definition of faith? And how is it given to us...how do we obtain it? Let's first put together a working defintion of faith.

Faith is "the conviction that God exists and is the creator and ruler of all things, the provider and bestower of eternal salvation through Christ. Faith is "a strong conviction or belief that Jesus is the Messiah, through whom we obtain eternal salvation in the kingdom of God." To put it another way: faith is absolute certainty that Christ is Who the Father has revealed Him to be and vice versa. Faith is also confidence in who the Spirit has revealed Father and Son to be through the Scriptures. Faith and trust are often used synomously. When we say that we have faith in Christ, we are saying that we trust Him because He has revealed Himself to be trustworthy. Did you get that last phrase? The reason we trust Christ is because He has revealed Himself to be worthy of trust or faith. Faith then must be instilled in a person as the object of faith proves itself to be worthy of trust. Faith is not blind trust. That is an unbiblical definition of faith. That is the world's definition of faith. No where does God ever call us to trust Him without knowing Him. He calls us to trust Him as He has shown Himself to be. That being said, Christ is faith worthy. We cannot know this about Him through general revelation alone. The Lord must deliberately and specifically reveal Himself so that we can see that He is worthy of faith and confidence. This in essence is how we obtain faith. When God reveals Himself, faith is given to us or instilled in us. That is why faith comes by hearing the Word of Christ. Christ speaks of Himself as all of Scripture does. When we hear of Christ we see His glorious nature and it's in seeing His nature that we see that we can trust Him for life and salvation...and so we trust Him. That is how God gives faith to us. We obtain it by special revelation...the Word of God.

As an example, I would say that I trust my wife because she has shown herself to be trustworthy. I don't blindly have faith and confidence in her. I trust her because I have seen her character. That is exactly how God calls us to trust in the Son. We trust what we've been shown. I believe this is the Biblical definition of faith.

Now even if the Arminian view of election was right...let's assume that it is for right now. Even if that view was correct, we're still left with the question: What specifically is man trusting about Christ? The answer: He's trusting that Christ is the righteous Savior that the Father sent and that the Spirit revealed. Both Arminian and Calvinist would agree. But we must take it a step further. How did the Arminian come to know that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior? How did the Arminian come to know that the Son was the Savior? Matthew 16:17 tells us that the Father reveals who Christ is. Matthew 11:27 tells us that it is the Son who reveals the Father and that the only ones who know the Father are the ones whom the Son chooses to reveal the Father. The Son elects or choose who gets to know the Father. The Father chooses or elects who gets to know the Son. If neither the Father or the Son choose to reveal the other then you cannot trust them in the way that leads to salvation. What exactly are you going to trust if they have not revealed themselves to you? You cannot obtain or receive faith if they choose to remain hidden to you.

Now if you're following where I'm going with this, and you adhere to the Arminian view of election, then you're forced to say that the only reason a person is elected to salvation is because they had faith in God. But you must add this next thought to your understanding of election. The reason that anyone would ever obtain faith in God, in Christ, is because God elected or chose to reveal Himself which is the means by which we are given faith. The Arminian is forced, at this point, to basically agree with the Calvinist. God chose us first, not the other way around.

So if God had to look down the corridor of time to see who'd choose Him, what He'd see first and foremost is that He chose to reveal Himself so that faith could be given to or instilled in sinners so that they'd choose Him. The Arminian view is just not compatible with Scripture. It is forced to ignore the means by which God gives a person faith. If you toss out that doctrine, then the Arminian may have a leg to stand on. But you can't toss out that doctrine. And you just can't stop with faith being put in Christ. You must go to the source of that faith. When you go to the source, you're brought back to the reality that God is the causation of our faith. And then you're forced to believe what we Calvinists believe. God chose us without any condition on our part. It was His Sovereign grace that led us to know Him. That knowledge of Him is what created faith in us which led to our trusting in Him for salvation.

This wonderful song gives us a snapshot of what I'm trying to say.

I KNOW WHOM I HAVE BELIEVED
I know not why God’s wondrous grace
To me He hath made known
Nor why unworthy, Christ in love,
Redeemed me for His own

CHORUS
But I know whom I have believed
And am persuaded that He is able
To keep that which I’ve committed
Unto Him against that day

I know not how this saving faith
To me He did impart
Nor how believing in His Word
Wrought peace within my heart

I know now how the Spirit moves,
Convincing men of sin
Revealing Jesus through the Word,
Creating faith in Him



God bless you my friends. The doctrines of grace are much better than the doctrines of wage. ;-)

Free Will(y) - Simplified


a scene from Free Willy 7 : Bondage Of The Will*


Has God determined the end from the beginning?
Has He chosen before the foundation of the world?
Will those whom he called be justified, be sanctified, and be glorified?
(see Isaiah 46:10, Ephesians 1:4, Romans 8:29-30 for the answers)

Phil Johnson boils down free willers (arminians) into one of two words:



If tomorrow is predetermined and you don't want to acknowledge that the plan was decreed by God, you have only two choices:

Some being other than God determines the future and is therefore more sovereign than He. That is a kind of idolatry.

Some impersonal force does the determining without reason or coherence. That is a kind of fatalism.

So anyone who denies that God preordained whatsoever comes to pass but wants to avoid both fatalism and idolatry is logically compelled to deny God's omnscience.

That of course, is precisely the rationale that has led so many to embrace Open Theism.

The more sensible option—and the biblical one—would be to abandon Arminian presuppositions and acknowledge that God declared the end from the beginning, and that He works all things according to the counsel of His own will.



-Phil Johnson on Pyromaniacs


God never hands over the reigns of sovereignty ever. Not for a single moment.

*not an actual movie

why did they believe?


Was it because they mustered up enough will to choose?

Acts 13:48

"When the Gentiles heard this, they were glad and honored the word of the Lord; and all who were appointed for eternal life believed."

Because God is Eternal, Omnipotent and Sovereign over time, space, and sinful man's will.

The Doctrine Of Election - Part 1

By A.W. Pink

1. Introduction

Election is a foundational doctrine. In the past, many of the ablest teachers were accustomed to commence their systematic theology with a presentation of the attributes of God, and then a contemplation of His eternal decrees; and it is our studied conviction, after perusing the writings of many of our moderns, that the method followed by their predecessors cannot be improved upon. God existed before man, and His eternal purpose long antedated His works in time. "Known unto God are all his works from the beginning of the world" (#Ac 15:18). The divine councils went before creation. As a builder draws his plans before he begins to build, so the great Architect predestinated everything before a single creature was called into existence. Nor has God kept this a secret locked in His own bosom; it has pleased Him to make known in His Word the everlasting counsels of His grace, His design in the same, and the grand end He has in view.

When a building is in course of construction onlookers are often at a loss to perceive the reason for many of the details. As yet, they discern no order or design; everything appears to be in confusion. But if they could carefully scan the builder’s "plan" and visualize the finished production, much that had puzzled would become clear to them. It is the same with the outworking of God’s eternal purpose. Unless we are acquainted with His eternal decrees, history remains an insoluble enigma. God is not working at random: the gospel has been sent forth on no uncertain mission: the final outcome in the conflict between good and evil has not been left indeterminate; how many are to be saved or lost depends not on the will of the creature. Everything was infallibly determined and immutably fixed by God from the beginning, and all that happens in time is but the accomplishment of what was ordained in eternity.

The grand truth of election, then, takes us back to the beginning of all things. It antedated the entrance of sin into the universe, the fall of man, the advent of Christ, and the proclamation of the gospel. A right understanding of it, especially in its relation to the everlasting covenant, is absolutely essential if we are to be preserved from fundamental error. If the foundation itself be faulty, then the building erected on it cannot be sound; and if we err in our conceptions of this basic truth, then just in proportion as we do so will our grasp of all other truth be inaccurate. God’s dealings with Jew and Gentile, His object in sending His Son into this world, His design by the gospel, yea, the whole of His providential dealings, cannot be seen in their proper perspective till they are viewed in the light of His eternal election. This will become the more evident as we proceed.

It is a difficult doctrine, and this in three respects. First, in the understanding of it. Unless we are privileged to sit under the ministry of some Spirit-taught servant of God, who presents the truth to us systematically, great pains and diligence are called for in the searching of the Scriptures, so that we may collect and tabulate their scattered statements on this subject. It has not pleased the Holy Spirit to give us one complete and orderly setting forth of the doctrine of election, but instead "here a little, there a little"-in typical history, in psalm and prophecy, in the great prayer of Christ (#Joh 17), in the epistles of the apostles. Second, in the acceptation of it. This presents a much greater difficulty, for when the mind perceives what the Scriptures reveal thereon, the heart is loath to receive such an humbling and flesh-withering truth. How earnestly we need to pray for God to subdue our enmity against Him and our prejudice against His truth. Third, in the proclamation of it. No novice is competent to present this subject in its scriptural perspective and proportions.

But notwithstanding, these difficulties should not discourage, still less deter us, from an honest and serious effort to understand and heartily receive all that God has been pleased to reveal thereon. Difficulties are designed to humble us, to exercise us, to make us feel our need of wisdom from on high. It is not easy to arrive at a clear and adequate grasp of any of the great doctrines of Holy Writ, and God never intended it should be so. Truth has to be "bought" (#Pro 23:23) : alas that so few are willing to pay the price-devote to the prayerful study of the Word the time wasted on newspapers or idle recreations. These difficulties are not insurmountable, for the Spirit has been given to God’s people to guide them into all truth. Equally so for the minister of the Word: an humble waiting upon God, coupled with a diligent effort to be a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, will in due time fit him to expound this truth to the glory of God and the blessing of his hearers.

It is an important doctrine, as is evident from various considerations. Perhaps we can express most impressively the momentousness of this truth by pointing out that apart from eternal election there had never been any Jesus Christ, and therefore, no divine gospel; for if God had never chosen a people unto salvation, He had never sent His Son; and if He had sent no Saviour, none had ever been saved. Thus, the gospel itself originated in this vital matter of election. "But we are bound to give thanks always to God for you, brethren beloved of the Lord, because God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation" (#2Th 2:13). And why are we "bound to give thanks"? Because election is the root of all blessings, the spring of every mercy that the soul receives. If election be taken away, everything is taken away, for those who have any spiritual blessing are they who have all spiritual blessings "according as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world" (#Eph 1:3,4).

It was well said by Calvin, "We shall never be clearly convinced, as we ought to be, that our salvation flows from the fountain of God’s free mercy, till we are acquainted with His eternal election, which illustrates the grace of God by this comparison; that He adopts not all promiscuously to the hope of salvation, but He gives to some what He refuses to others. Ignorance of this principle evidently detracts from the divine glory, and diminishes real humility-If, then, we need to be recalled to the origin of election, to prove that we obtain salvation from no other source than the mere good pleasure of God, then they who desire to extinguish this principle, do all they can to obscure what ought to be magnificently and loudly celebrated."

It is a blessed doctrine, for election is the spring of all blessings. This is made unmistakably clear by (#Eph 1:3,4). First, the Holy Spirit declares that the saints have been blessed with all spiritual blessings in the heavenlies in Christ. Then He proceeds to show why and how they were so blessed: it is according as God hath chosen us in Christ before the foundation of the world. Election in Christ, therefore, precedes being blessed with all spiritual blessings, for we are blessed with them only as being in Him, and we are only in Him as chosen in Him. We see, then, what a grand and glorious truth this is, for all our hopes and prospects belong to it. Election, though distinct and personal, is not, as is sometimes carelessly stated, a mere abstract choice of persons unto eternal salvation, irrespective of union with their Covenant-Head, but a choice of them in Christ. It therefore implies every other blessing, and all other blessings are given only through it and in accordance with it.

Rightly understood there is nothing so calculated to impart comfort and courage, strength and security, as a heart-apprehension of this truth. To be assured that I am one of the high favorites of Heaven imparts the confidence that God most certainly will supply my every need and make all things work together for my good. The knowledge that God has predestinated me unto eternal glory supplies an absolute guarantee that no efforts of Satan can possibly bring about my destruction, for if the great God be for me, who can be against me! It brings great peace to the preacher, for he now discovers that God has not sent him forth to draw a bow at a venture, but that His Word shall accomplish that which He pleases, and shall prosper whereto He sends it (#Is 55:11). And what encouragement it should afford the awakened sinner. As he learns that election is solely a matter of divine grace, hope is kindled in his heart: as he discovers, that election singled out some of the vilest of the vile to be the monuments of divine mercy, why should he despair!

It is a distasteful doctrine. One had naturally thought that a truth so God-honoring, Christ-exalting, and so blessed, had been cordially espoused by all professing Christians who had had it clearly presented to them. In view of the fact that the terms "predestinated," "elect," and "chosen," occur so frequently in the Word, one would surely conclude that all who claim to accept the Scriptures as divinely inspired would receive with implicit faith this grand truth, referring the act itself -as becometh sinful and ignorant creatures so to do- unto the sovereign good pleasure of God. But such is far, very far from being the actual case. No doctrine is so detested by proud human nature as this one, which make nothing of the creature and everything of the Creator; yea, at no other point is the enmity of the carnal mind so blatantly and hotly evident.

We commenced our addresses in Australia by saying, "I am going to speak tonight on one of the most hated doctrines of the Bible, namely, that of God’s sovereign election." Since then we have encircled this globe, and come into more or less close contact with thousands of people belonging to many denominations, and thousands more of professing Christians attached to none, and today the only change we would make in that statement is, that while the truth of eternal punishment is the one most objectionable to non-professors, that of God’s sovereign election is the truth most loathed and reviled by the majority of those claiming to be believers. Let it be plainly announced that salvation originated not in the will of man, but in the will of God (see #Joh 1:13; Ro 9:16), that were it not so none would or could be saved-for as the result of the fall man has lost all desire and will unto that which is good (#Joh 5:40; Ro 3:11) -and that even the elect themselves have to be made willing (#Ps 110:3), and loud will be the cries of indignation raised against such teaching.

It is at this point the issue is drawn. Merit-mongers will not allow the supremacy of the divine will and the impotency unto good of the human will, consequently they who are the most bitter in denouncing election by the sovereign pleasure of God, are the warmest in crying up the freewill of fallen man. In the decrees of the council of Trent-wherein the Papacy definitely defined her position on the leading points raised by the Reformers, and which Rome has never rescinded-occurs the following: "If any one should affirm that since the fall of Adam man’s free will is lost, let him be accursed." It was for their faithful adherence to the truth of election, with all that it involves, that Bradford and hundreds of others were burned at the stake by the agents of the pope. Unspeakably sad is it to see so many professing Protestants agree with the mother of harlots in this fundamental error.

But whatever aversion men may now have to this blessed truth, they will be compelled to hear it in the last day, hear it as the voice of final, unalterable, and eternal decision. When death and hades, the sea and dry land, shall give up the dead, then shall the Book of Life-the register in which was recorded from before the foundation of the world the whole election of grace-be opened in the presence of angels and demons, in the presence of the saved and of the lost, and that voice shall sound to the highest arches of Heaven, to the lowest depths of hell, to the uttermost bound of the universe: "And whosoever was not found written in the Book of Life was cast into the lake of fire" (#Re 20:15). Thus, this truth which is hated by the non-elect above all others, is the one that shall ring in the ears of the lost as they enter their eternal doom! Ah, my reader, the reason why people do not receive and duly prize the truth of election, is because they do not feel their due need of it.

It is a separating doctrine. The preaching of the sovereignty of God, as exercised by Him in foreordaining the eternal destiny of each of His creatures, serves as an effectual flail to divide the chaff from the wheat. "He that is of God heareth God’s words" (#Joh 8:47) : yes, no matter how contrary they may be to his ideas. It is one of the marks of the regenerate that they set to their seal that God is true. Nor do they pick and choose, as will religious hypocrites: once they perceive a truth is clearly taught in the Word, even though it be utterly opposed to their own reason and inclinations, they humbly bow to it and implicitly receive it, and would do so though not another person in whole world believed it. But it is far otherwise with the unregenerate. As the apostle declares, "They are of the world: therefore speak they of the world, and the world heareth them. We are of God: he that knoweth God heareth us; he that is not of God heareth not us. Hereby know we the spirit of truth, and the spirit of error" (#1Jo 4:5,6).

We know of nothing so devisive between the sheep and the goats as a faithful exposition of this doctrine. If a servant of God accepts some new charge, and he wishes to ascertain which of his people desire the pure milk of the Word, and which prefer the Devil’s substitutes, let him deliver a series of sermons on this subject, and it will quickly be the means of "taking forth the precious from the vile" (#Jer 15:19). It was thus in the experience of the Divine Preacher: when Christ announced "no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father," we are told, "from that time many of his disciples went back, and walked no more with him" (#Joh 6:65,66) ! True it is that by no means all who intellectually receive "Calvinism" as a philosophy or theology, give evidence (in their daily lives) of regeneration; yet equally true is it that those who continue to cavil against and steadfastly refuse any part of the truth, are not entitled to be regarded as Christians.

It is a neglected doctrine. Though occupying so prominent a place in the Word of God, it is today but little preached, and still less understood. Of course, it is not to be expected that the "higher critics" and their blinded dupes should preach that which makes nothing of man; but even among those who wish to be looked up to as "orthodox" and "evangelical," there are scarcely any who give this grand truth a real place in either their pulpit ministrations or their writings. In some cases this is due to ignorance: not having been taught it in the seminary, and certainly not in the "Bible Institutes," they have never perceived its great importance and value. But in too many cases it is a desire to be popular with their hearers which muzzles their mouths. Nevertheless, neither ignorance, prejudice, nor enmity can do away with the doctrine itself, or lessen its vital momentousness.

In bringing to a close these introductory remarks, let it be pointed out that this blessed doctrine needs to be handled reverently. It is not a subject to be reasoned about and speculated upon, but approached in a spirit of holy awe and devotion. It is to be handled soberly, "When thou art in disputation, engaged upon a just quarrel to vindicate the truth of God from heresy and distortion, look into thy heart, set a watch on thy lips, beware of wild fire in thy zeal" (E. Reynolds, 1648). Nevertheless, this truth is to be dealt with uncompromisingly, and plainly, irrespective of the fear or favor of man, confidently leaving all "results" in the hand of God. May it be graciously granted us to write in a manner pleasing to God, and you to receive whatever is from Himself.